Reply comments concerning rulemaking, MB Docket Nos. 19-193, 17-105, "Amendments of Parts 73 and 74 to Improve the LPFM Radio Service Technical Rules" just concluded November 4, 2019. What is seen as a positive development, the FCC has provided a rulemaking to fix some of the small technical rules concerning Low Power broadcasting. Common Frequency applauds the Commission offering this opportunity. However, there is some lingering malaise concerning the state of LPFM which hangs over LP operators and advocates. First, there is a feeling of helplessness that the Commission disregards its obligations associated with the Local Community Radio Act, which has lead to a give-away of spectrum in places that should have been reserved for LPFM service under the law. Places like Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma has seen seen all of its secondary service spectrum allotted to translator service when a part was supposed to be reserved for LPFM use. Second, concerning this latest rulemaking, the impetus for this proceeding was Rec Network's Petition for Rulemaking RM-11810 and RM-11749 which proposed a power upgrade for LPFM service. The avoided subject matter is that these issues are intertwined with the current political environment. A Republican Commission is traditionally more subservient to the concerns of business lobbyists versus public interest measures. This has created an impasse on the subject of a 250 watt upgrade for LPFM (or "LP-250").